429 lines
21 KiB
Plaintext
429 lines
21 KiB
Plaintext
Novec 649, 1230 !Short name
|
|
756-13-8 !CAS number
|
|
1,1,1,2,2,4,5,5,5-Nonafluoro-4-(trifluoromethyl)-3-pentanone !Full name
|
|
CF3CF2C(=O)CF(CF3)2 !Chemical formula {C6F12O}
|
|
Dodecafluoro-2-methylpentan-3-one !Synonym
|
|
316.0444 !Molar mass [g/mol]
|
|
165. !Triple point temperature [K]
|
|
322.202 !Normal boiling point [K]
|
|
441.81 !Critical temperature [K]
|
|
1869.0 !Critical pressure [kPa]
|
|
1.92 !Critical density [mol/L]
|
|
0.471 !Acentric factor
|
|
0.43 !Dipole moment [Debye]; calculated by A. Kazakov, April 2017, unc. +/- 0.12-.2
|
|
IIR !Default reference state
|
|
10.0 !Version number
|
|
???? !UN Number :UN:
|
|
halocb !Family :Family:
|
|
???? !Heating value (upper) [kJ/mol] :Heat:
|
|
1S/C6F12O/c7-2(4(10,11)12,5(13,14)15)1(19)3(8,9)6(16,17)18 :InChi: !Standard InChI String
|
|
RMLFHPWPTXWZNJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N !Standard InChI Key :InChiKey:
|
|
7b3b4080 (butane) !Alternative fluid for mixing rules :AltID:
|
|
a9e22c00 !Hash number from InChI Key :Hash:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
!The fluid files contain general information about the fluid in the first 15 to 20 lines, followed by sections for the
|
|
! equations of state, transport equations, and auxiliary equations. Equations of state are listed first. The NIST recommended
|
|
! equations begin with a hash mark (#). The secondary equations begin with the @ symbol. These symbols can be swapped to
|
|
! select a secondary equation as primary and the primary as secondary. The equation of state section also contains auxiliary
|
|
! equations for the ideal gas heat capacity or ideal gas Helmholtz energy. Below the equations of state (both primary and
|
|
! secondary) are the transport equations, first viscosity and then thermal conductivity. These are then followed by the
|
|
! secondary equations if available. The transport section also contains auxiliary equations required to calculate either the
|
|
! dilute gas state or the critical enhancement. At the end of the file are additional but not necessary auxiliary equations,
|
|
! including simple equations for the vapor pressure, saturated liquid and vapor densities, melting line (for some fluids), and
|
|
! sublimation line (for even fewer fluids). This section also contains the equations for dielectric constant and surface
|
|
! tension if available. The sections are divided by different symbols (these being _-+=^*~) to aid the eye in locating a
|
|
! particular section. Secondary equations are indented 10 spaces to avoid confusion with the NIST recommended equations. The
|
|
! end of the fluid file is marked with @END. Anything below that is ignored.
|
|
|
|
|
|
! compiled by E.W. Lemmon, NIST Physical and Chemical Properties Division, Boulder, Colorado
|
|
! 03-04-09 EWL, Original version.
|
|
! 07-07-11 EWL, Update equation of state.
|
|
! 09-12-11 MLH, Update viscosisity based on data of Fortin (2011).
|
|
! 07-25-12 EWL, Update equation of state.
|
|
! 07-25-12 MLH, Update transport.
|
|
! 05-24-16 MLH, Add critical enhancement prediction, revised surface tension, viscosity, thermal conductivity.
|
|
! 03-13-17 MLH, Revise transport with new data.
|
|
! 04-28-17 MLH, Add final Meng viscosity correlation, revised dipole moment.
|
|
! 08-31-17 MLH, Revised tc fit 8.28.17, revised Meng correlation.
|
|
! 03-30-18 MLH, Add surface tension model of Cui et al. (2018).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
#EOS !---Equation of state---
|
|
FEQ !Helmholtz equation of state for Novec 649 of McLinden et al. (2015).
|
|
:TRUECRITICALPOINT: 441.81 1.92 !True EOS critical point [K, mol/L] (where dP/dD=0 and d^2P/dD^2=0 at constant T)
|
|
:DOI: 10.1021/acs.jced.5b00623
|
|
?
|
|
?```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
|
|
?McLinden, M.O., Perkins, R.A., Lemmon, E.W., and Fortin, T.J.,
|
|
? "Thermodynamic Properties of 1,1,1,2,2,4,5,5,5-Nonafluoro-4-
|
|
? (Trifluoromethyl)-3-Pentanone: Vapor Pressure, (p, rho, T) Behavior, and
|
|
? Speed of Sound Measurements, and an Equation of State,"
|
|
? J. Chem. Eng. Data, 60:3646-3659, 2015.
|
|
? doi: 10.1021/acs.jced.5b00623
|
|
?
|
|
?The uncertainty in liquid density is 0.05% from 220 K to 440 K at pressures to
|
|
? 40 MPa. No data are available below 220 K. Above 440 K, the uncertainty remains
|
|
? small for liquid like states, and increases near the critical region (but
|
|
? unknown due to a lack of data). In the vapor region, data are again absent, but
|
|
? high accuracy speed of sound data indicate that the uncertainty may be less than
|
|
? 0.2%. The uncertainty in vapor pressure is 0.5% above 270 K. The uncertainty in
|
|
? vapor speed of sound is 0.05%, and the uncertainty is 0.1% for saturated liquid
|
|
? states. The uncertainty in heat capacities is estimated to be 2% or less.
|
|
?
|
|
!```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
|
|
165. !Lower temperature limit [K]
|
|
500. !Upper temperature limit [K]
|
|
50000. !Upper pressure limit [kPa]
|
|
6.24 !Maximum density [mol/L]
|
|
CPP !Pointer to Cp0 model
|
|
316.0444 !Molar mass [g/mol]
|
|
165. !Triple point temperature [K]
|
|
0.0002315 !Pressure at triple point [kPa]
|
|
6.23 !Density at triple point [mol/L]
|
|
322.202 !Normal boiling point temperature [K]
|
|
0.471 !Acentric factor
|
|
441.81 1869.0 1.92 !Tc [K], pc [kPa], rhoc [mol/L]
|
|
441.81 1.92 !Reducing parameters [K, mol/L]
|
|
8.3144598 !Gas constant [J/mol-K]
|
|
10 4 7 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 !# terms and # coefs/term for normal terms, Gaussian terms, and Gao terms
|
|
0.05623648 1.0 4. 0. !a(i),t(i),d(i),l(i)
|
|
2.973616 0.25 1. 0.
|
|
-6.12697 0.793 1. 0.
|
|
3.44024 1.16 1. 0.
|
|
1.451737 0.75 2. 0.
|
|
-2.837857 1.09 2. 0.
|
|
0.2077767 0.75 3. 0.
|
|
2.168307 1.3 2. 1.
|
|
-2.124648 2.25 1. 2.
|
|
-1.296704 1.9 2. 2.
|
|
-1.010569 0.88 1. 2. 2. -0.32 -0.12 1.10 1.16 0. 0. 0.
|
|
2.701505 1.63 1. 2. 2. -1.32 -0.83 1.04 0.793 0. 0. 0.
|
|
0.8167202 1.3 2. 2. 2. -1.35 -0.19 1.15 1.13 0. 0. 0.
|
|
-1.814579 2.0 2. 2. 2. -1.48 -0.95 0.90 0.527 0. 0. 0.
|
|
0.2075389 1.15 3. 2. 2. -0.51 -0.10 0.80 1.19 0. 0. 0.
|
|
-1.009347 1.66 3. 2. 2. -1.30 -0.11 1.20 0.83 0. 0. 0.
|
|
-0.04848043 1.5 1. 2. 2. -5.15 -65.0 1.19 0.82 0. 0. 0.
|
|
eta beta gamma epsilon
|
|
EXP[eta*(delta-epsilon)^2+beta*(tau-gamma)^2]
|
|
|
|
|
|
#AUX !---Auxiliary function for Cp0
|
|
CPP !Ideal gas heat capacity function for Novec 649 of McLinden et al. (2015).
|
|
?
|
|
?```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
|
|
?McLinden, M.O., Perkins, R.A., Lemmon, E.W., and Fortin, T.J., 2015.
|
|
?
|
|
!```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
|
|
0. !
|
|
10000. !
|
|
0. !
|
|
0. !
|
|
1.0 8.3144598 !Reducing parameters for T, Cp0
|
|
1 1 0 0 0 0 0 !Nterms: polynomial, exponential, cosh, sinh
|
|
30.8 0.0
|
|
29.8 1940.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
#AUX !---Auxiliary function for PX0
|
|
PX0 !Helmholtz energy ideal-gas function for Novec 649 of McLinden et al. (2015).
|
|
?
|
|
?```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
|
|
?McLinden, M.O., Perkins, R.A., Lemmon, E.W., and Fortin, T.J., 2015.
|
|
?
|
|
!```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
|
|
1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 !Nterms: ai*log(tau**ti); ai*tau**ti; ai*log(1-exp(bi*tau))
|
|
29.8 1.0 !ai, ti for [ai*log(tau**ti)] terms
|
|
-30.6610562197870706 0.0 !aj, ti for [ai*tau**ti] terms
|
|
6.8305323064645878 1.0 !aj, ti for [ai*tau**ti] terms
|
|
29.8 1940.0 !aj, ti for [ai*log(1-exp(-ti/T)] terms
|
|
|
|
|
|
#AUX !---Auxiliary function for PH0
|
|
PH0 !Ideal gas Helmholtz form for Novec 649.
|
|
?
|
|
?```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
|
|
?McLinden, M.O., Perkins, R.A., Lemmon, E.W., and Fortin, T.J., 2015.
|
|
?
|
|
!```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
|
|
0. !
|
|
10000. !
|
|
0. !
|
|
0. !
|
|
1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 !Nterms: ai*log(tau**ti); ai*tau**ti; ai*log(1-exp(bi*tau)); cosh; sinh
|
|
29.8 1.0 !ai, ti for [ai*log(tau**ti)] terms
|
|
-30.6610503233 0.0 !aj, ti for [ai*tau**ti] terms
|
|
6.8305296372 1.0
|
|
29.8 -4.3910278174 !aj, ti for [ai*log(1-exp(ti*tau)] terms
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
#ETA !---Viscosity---
|
|
VS1 !Pure fluid viscosity model for Novec 649 of Wen et al. (2017).
|
|
:DOI: 10.1021/acs.jced.7b00572
|
|
?
|
|
?```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
|
|
?Wen, C., Meng, X., Huber, M.L., Wu, J., "Measurement and Correlation of the Viscosity of 1,1,1,2,2,4,5,5,5-Nonafluoro-4-(Trifluoromethyl)-3-Pentanone,"
|
|
? J. Chem. Eng. Data, 62:3603-3609, 2017. doi: 10.1021/acs.jced.7b00572
|
|
? Estimated uncertainty in the liquid phase from 240- 400 K at pressures to 40 MPa is 2%.
|
|
? No data for gas phase; estimated uncertainty 10%.
|
|
?
|
|
!```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
|
|
165.0 !Lower temperature limit [K]
|
|
600.0 !Upper temperature limit [K]
|
|
50000.0 !Upper pressure limit [kPa]
|
|
8.0 !Maximum density [mol/L]
|
|
1 !Number of terms associated with dilute-gas function
|
|
CI0 !Pointer to reduced effective collision cross-section model
|
|
0.6509 !Lennard-Jones coefficient sigma [nm]
|
|
350.84 !Lennard-Jones coefficient epsilon/kappa [K]
|
|
1.0 1.0 !Reducing parameters for T, eta
|
|
0.412899 0.5 !=0.02669*SQRT(MW)*fc [Chapman-Enskog term] for Chung method
|
|
9 !Number of terms for initial density dependence
|
|
350.84 0.166071 !Reducing parameters for T (=eps/k), etaB2 (= 0.6022137*sigma**3)
|
|
-19.572881 0.0 !Coefficient, power in T* = T/(eps/k)
|
|
219.73999 -0.25
|
|
-1015.3226 -0.5
|
|
2471.0125 -0.75
|
|
-3375.1717 -1.0
|
|
2491.6597 -1.25
|
|
-787.26086 -1.5
|
|
14.085455 -2.5
|
|
-0.34664158 -5.5
|
|
0 1 1 5 0 0 !# resid terms: close-packed density; simple poly; numerator of rational poly; denominator of rat. poly; numerator of exponential; denominator of exponential
|
|
441.81 1.92 1.0 !Reducing parameters for T, rho, eta (correlation in terms of uPa-s)
|
|
22.0057 0.5 0.6666666666 0. 0 !Coefficient, power of tau, del n1
|
|
231.063 0.5 0.6666666667 0. 0 !Coefficient, power of tau, del n2
|
|
0.423359 0.0 0. 0. 0 !Coefficient, power of tau, del n3
|
|
-0.122057 0.0 1. 0. 0 !Coefficient, power of tau, del n4
|
|
18.4610 1.0 0. 0. 0 !Coefficient, power of tau, del n5
|
|
-11.1393 1.0 1. 0. 0 !Coefficient, power of tau, del n6
|
|
1.67777 1.0 2. 0. 0 !Coefficient, power of tau, del n7
|
|
NUL !Pointer to the viscosity critical enhancement auxiliary function (none used)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
================================================================================
|
|
|
|
#TCX !---Thermal conductivity---
|
|
TC1 !Pure fluid thermal conductivity model for Novec 649 of Perkins et al. (2018).
|
|
:DOI:
|
|
?
|
|
?```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
|
|
?Perkins, R.A., Huber, M.L., and Assael, M.J., "Measurement and Correlation of the Thermal Conductivity
|
|
? of 1,1,1,2,2,4,5,5,5-Nonafluoro-4-(Trifluoromethyl)-3-Pentanone," accepted for publication J. Chem. Eng. Data, 2018.
|
|
? Estimated uncertainty 1% in the liquid to 70 MPa, 4% in the vapor, 4% for supercritical fluid with density <200 kg/m3,
|
|
? 3% for supercritical fluid at 200 <rho <800 kg/m3, and 1% for supercritical fluid above 800 kg/m3.
|
|
? Uncertainties near critical are larger.
|
|
?
|
|
!```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
|
|
165. !Lower temperature limit [K]
|
|
600. !Upper temperature limit [K]
|
|
50000. !Upper pressure limit [kPa]
|
|
8.0 !Maximum density [mol/L]
|
|
6 4 !# terms for dilute gas function: numerator, denominator
|
|
441.81 0.001 !Reducing parameters for T, tcx
|
|
1.54022 0.
|
|
-15.0745 1.
|
|
49.0451 2.
|
|
-60.7192 3.
|
|
46.2647 4.
|
|
-3.16935 5.
|
|
-0.211741 0.
|
|
1.16696 1.
|
|
-1.15574 2.
|
|
1.0 3.
|
|
10 0 !# terms for background gas function: numerator, denominator
|
|
441.81 1.92 1. !Reducing parameters for T, rho, tcx
|
|
-0.0234542 0. 1. 0.
|
|
0.0418017 0. 2. 0.
|
|
-0.0274745 0. 3. 0.
|
|
0.00932188 0. 4. 0.
|
|
-0.00111766 0. 5. 0.
|
|
0.0158544 1. 1. 0.
|
|
-0.0334181 1. 2. 0.
|
|
0.0282766 1. 3. 0.
|
|
-0.0103009 1. 4. 0.
|
|
0.00147852 1. 5. 0.
|
|
TK3 !Pointer to critical enhancement auxiliary function
|
|
|
|
|
|
#AUX !---Auxiliary function for the thermal conductivity critical enhancement
|
|
TK3 !Simplified thermal conductivity critical enhancement for Novec 649 of Perkins et al. (2013).
|
|
?
|
|
?```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
|
|
?Perkins, R.A., Sengers, J.V., Abdulagatov, I.M., and Huber, M.L.,
|
|
? "Simplified Model for the Critical Thermal-Conductivity Enhancement in Molecular Fluids,"
|
|
? Int. J. Thermophys., 34(2):191-212, 2013. doi: 10.1007/s10765-013-1409-z
|
|
?
|
|
!```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
|
|
0. !
|
|
10000. !
|
|
0. !
|
|
0. !
|
|
9 0 0 0 !# terms: CO2-terms, spare, spare, spare
|
|
1.0 1.0 1.0 !Reducing parameters for T, rho, tcx [mW/(m-K)]
|
|
0.63 !Nu (universal exponent)
|
|
1.239 !Gamma (universal exponent)
|
|
1.02 !R0 (universal amplitude)
|
|
0.063 !Z (universal exponent--not used for t.c., only viscosity)
|
|
1.0 !C (constant in viscosity eqn = 1/[2 - (alpha + gamma)/(2*nu)], but often set to 1)
|
|
0.251e-9 !Xi0 (amplitude) [m]
|
|
0.061 !Gam0 (amplitude) [-]
|
|
0.334e-9 !Qd_inverse (modified effective cutoff parameter) [m] in the EOS block
|
|
662.72 !Tref (reference temperature)=1.5*Tc [K] use2*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
|
|
|
|
@TRN !---ECS Transport---
|
|
ECS !Extended Corresponding States model (Propane reference); fitted to limited data for Novec 649.
|
|
?
|
|
?```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
|
|
?Unpublished; uses method described in the following reference:
|
|
?Huber, M.L., Laesecke, A., and Perkins, R.A.
|
|
? "Model for the Viscosity and Thermal Conductivity of Refrigerants, Including
|
|
? a New Correlation for the Viscosity of R134a,"
|
|
? Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 42(13):3163-3178, 2003. doi: 10.1021/ie0300880
|
|
?
|
|
?VISCOSITY
|
|
? unpublished manufacturer data 2010; preliminary unpublished data (X. Meng, personal communication)
|
|
?
|
|
?Estimated uncertainty in liquid phase at temperatures above 270 K and pressures
|
|
? to 40 MPa is 5%, rising to 20% at lower temperatures.
|
|
? No data for gas phase; estimated uncertainty 20 %
|
|
?
|
|
?THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY
|
|
? Literature data unavailable. Coefficients based on unpublished and manufacturer data.
|
|
? Estimated uncertainty for the gas phase is 5 %, liquid phase is 6% for pressures to 20 MPa, increasing to 10% at 50 MPa.
|
|
?
|
|
?The Lennard-Jones parameters were estimated with the method of Chung.
|
|
?
|
|
!```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
|
|
165. !Lower temperature limit [K]
|
|
500.0 !Upper temperature limit [K]
|
|
50000.0 !Upper pressure limit [kPa]
|
|
10.0 !Maximum density [mol/L]
|
|
FEQ PROPANE.FLD
|
|
VS1 !Model for reference fluid viscosity
|
|
TC1 !Model for reference fluid thermal conductivity
|
|
BIG !Large molecule identifier
|
|
0.87 0. 0. 0. !Large molecule parameters
|
|
1 !Lennard-Jones flag (0 or 1) (0 => use estimates)
|
|
0.6509 !Lennard-Jones coefficient sigma [nm] for ECS method (estimated)
|
|
350.8 !Lennard-Jones coefficient epsilon/kappa [K] for ECS method (estimated)
|
|
2 0 0 !Number of terms in f_int term in Eucken correlation, spare1, spare2
|
|
0.0014362 0. 0. 0. !Coefficient, power of T, spare1, spare2 1.3678e-3
|
|
8.36805e-7 0. 0. 0. !Coefficient, power of T, spare1, spare2
|
|
3 0 0 !Number of terms in psi (visc shape factor): poly,spare1,spare2
|
|
1.02397 0. 0. 0. !Coefficient, power of Tr, power of Dr, spare
|
|
0.0818018 0. 1. 0. !Coefficient, power of Tr, power of Dr, spare
|
|
-0.0203596 0. 2. 0. !Coefficient, power of Tr, power of Dr, spare
|
|
2 0 0 !Number of terms in chi (t.c. shape factor): poly,spare1,spare2
|
|
1.04156 0. 0. 0. !Coefficient, power of Tr, power of Dr, spare
|
|
0.0422277 0. 1. 0. !Coefficient, power of Tr, power of Dr, spare
|
|
TK3 !Pointer to critical enhancement auxiliary function
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
#STN !---Surface tension---
|
|
ST1 !Surface tension model for Novec 649 of Cui et al. (2018)
|
|
:DOI: 10.1021/acs.jced.7b00902
|
|
?
|
|
?```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
|
|
?Cui, J., Yan, S., Bi, S., and Wu, J.,
|
|
? "Saturated Liquid Dynamic Viscosity and Surface Tension of
|
|
? trans-1-Chloro-3-3-3-Trifluoropropene and Dodecafluoro-2-Methylpentan-3-One,"
|
|
? J. Chem. Eng. Data, 63:751-756, 2018. doi: 10.1021/acs.jced.7b00902
|
|
?
|
|
!```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
|
|
0. !
|
|
10000. !
|
|
0. !
|
|
0. !
|
|
1 !Number of terms in surface tension model
|
|
441.81 !Critical temperature used in fit (dummy)
|
|
0.043655 1.2556 !Sigma0 and n
|
|
|
|
|
|
#PS !---Vapor pressure---
|
|
PS5 !Vapor pressure equation for Novec 649 of McLinden et al. (2015).
|
|
?
|
|
?```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
|
|
?Functional Form: P=Pc*EXP[SUM(Ni*Theta^ti)*Tc/T] where Theta=1-T/Tc, Tc and Pc
|
|
? are the reducing parameters below, which are followed by rows containing Ni and ti.
|
|
?
|
|
!```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
|
|
0. !
|
|
10000. !
|
|
0. !
|
|
0. !
|
|
441.81 1869. !Reducing parameters
|
|
5 0 0 0 0 0 !Number of terms in equation
|
|
-8.4411 1.0
|
|
2.7110 1.5
|
|
-3.6354 2.2
|
|
-5.3872 4.4
|
|
-8.1641 15.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
#DL !---Saturated liquid density---
|
|
DL1 !Saturated liquid density equation for Novec 649 of McLinden et al. (2015).
|
|
?
|
|
?```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
|
|
?Functional Form: D=Dc*[1+SUM(Ni*Theta^ti)] where Theta=1-T/Tc, Tc and Dc are
|
|
? the reducing parameters below, which are followed by rows containing Ni and ti.
|
|
?
|
|
!```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
|
|
0. !
|
|
10000. !
|
|
0. !
|
|
0. !
|
|
441.81 1.92 !Reducing parameters
|
|
3 0 0 0 0 0 !Number of terms in equation
|
|
1.5545 0.297
|
|
1.1490 0.7
|
|
0.51565 4.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
#DV !---Saturated vapor density---
|
|
DV3 !Saturated vapor density equation for Novec 649 of McLinden et al. (2015).
|
|
?
|
|
?```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
|
|
?Functional Form: D=Dc*EXP[SUM(Ni*Theta^ti)] where Theta=1-T/Tc, Tc and Dc are
|
|
? the reducing parameters below, which are followed by rows containing Ni and ti.
|
|
?
|
|
!```````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
|
|
0. !
|
|
10000. !
|
|
0. !
|
|
0. !
|
|
441.81 1.92 !Reducing parameters
|
|
5 0 0 0 0 0 !Number of terms in equation
|
|
-1.6073 0.291
|
|
-5.8095 0.82
|
|
-17.824 2.45
|
|
-61.012 5.5
|
|
-151.30 12.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
@END
|
|
c 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
|
|
c2345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890
|